Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media, as well as to allow video information to be shared for both marketing, analytics and editorial purposes.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | The Journal of Headache and Pain

Fig. 1

From: Induction of more severe central sensitization in a medication overuse headache model mice through active ingestion of rizatriptan

Fig. 1

Overuse of RIZ Enhances Potential Nociceptive Sensitization Induced by Repeated NTG Interventions A. Experimental flowchart for behavioural testing. RIZ: rizatriptan. NS: normal saline. NTG: nitroglycerin. i.p.: intraperitoneal injection. p.o.: peros. EPM: elevated plus maze. OFT: open field test. B Comparison of trends in hind paw mechanical pain thresholds over time during modelling and during withdrawal among the four groups (left). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, NS + DDW group vs. NTG + RIZ group. $p < 0.05, $$p < 0.01, $$$p < 0.001, $$$$p < 0.0001 NS + DDW group vs. NTG + DDW group. &p < 0.05 NS + RIZ group vs. NTG + DDW group. ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01, ^^^p < 0.001, ^^^^p < 0.0001 NS + DDW group vs. NS + RIZ group. @ p < 0.05, @@p < 0.01 NS + RIZ group vs. NTG + RIZ group. Comparison of trends in head mechanical pain thresholds over time during modelling and during withdrawal among the four groups (right). * p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 NS + DDW group vs. NTG + RIZ group. $p < 0.05, $$p < 0.01 NS + DDW group vs. NTG + DDW group. &p < 0.05 NS + RIZ group vs. NTG + DDW group. ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01 NS + DDW group vs. NS + RIZ group. The data are presented as the means ± SEMs. n = 6 mice per group. C Changes in mechanical nociceptive thresholds in the head and hind paw regions over 5 h following SNP stimulation in the four groups of mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (NS + DDW vs. NTG + RIZ). @p < 0.05, @@p < 0.01 (NS + RIZ vs. NTG + RIZ). #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 (NTG + DDW vs. NTG + RIZ). ^p < 0.05 (NS + DDW vs. NS + RIZ). The data are presented as the means ± SEMs. n = 6 mice per group. D Temporal progression of active feeding behavioural patterns in the four experimental cohorts during the model establishment phase. n = 6 mice per group. E Comparative behavioural analysis in the EPM test and movement trajectory heatmaps between the NTG + RIZ and NS + DDW groups post-modelling. The heatmap spectrum reflects the dwelling time distribution across spatial coordinates, ranging from deep blue (minimal duration) to bright yellow (maximal duration). Structural delineations: Thinner borders denote open arms, and thicker borders represent closed arms. The number of experimental animals per group was 18. F Open field behavioural comparison between the NTG + RIZ and NS + DDW groups post-modelling. The thermal gradient illustrates the spatial dwelling time from deep blue (lowest) to bright yellow (highest). The inner quadrant demarcates the central zone, with the annular region between the inner and outer quadrants defining the peripheral area. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, NS + DDW group vs. NTG + RIZ group. n = 18 mice per group

Back to article page